Hi All,
We have implemented default administration module shipped in V!3 Sp2 framework. While creating new user it uses component UFUMUDX.HTM, but it doesn't check VFPPF06 file to see if the user is already present or not. at present it allows creation of existing users.
We are not sure do we have this validation to check file from this HTMl script, can someone please help us in achieving the same.
Thanks for your help in-advance.
Thanks,
Priya
Duplicate Profile getting created
Re: Duplicate Profile getting created
Hi All,
Can someone help on this
Regards,
Priya
Can someone help on this
Regards,
Priya
Re: Duplicate Profile getting created
The UF prefix in the name UFUMUDX.HTM means it is designed to be site modifiable.
So you could copy it to another name and modify it as required.
However, I don't really think anyone would be prepared to do this for free via a forum.
So you could copy it to another name and modify it as required.
However, I don't really think anyone would be prepared to do this for free via a forum.
Re: Duplicate Profile getting created
Hi Mark,
We had used function UFUMF1 to load filter component, when we copy this to another function and try to execute we get attached message. When we tried to change in existing function(UFUMF1) that as well wasn't accepted it throws fatal message.
Hence we aren't sure how and where do we add our customized logic to achieve this feature.
Regards,
priya
We had used function UFUMF1 to load filter component, when we copy this to another function and try to execute we get attached message. When we tried to change in existing function(UFUMF1) that as well wasn't accepted it throws fatal message.
Hence we aren't sure how and where do we add our customized logic to achieve this feature.
Regards,
priya
- Attachments
-
- Message1.PNG (53.59 KiB) Viewed 24172 times
Re: Duplicate Profile getting created
This is a WEBEVENT function, so it's how you did things 10 - 15 years ago.
There's a pretty extensive check list in the error message.
The one I'd check first is:
Did you do that when you created the new process to contain the new function?
Also, if you do it later you should recompile the process and function again after making the changes.
There's a pretty extensive check list in the error message.
The one I'd check first is:
Did you do that when you created the new process to contain the new function?
Also, if you do it later you should recompile the process and function again after making the changes.
Re: Duplicate Profile getting created
The option is found here:
and it looks like this:
Note that it's for the process that the WEBEVENT function belongs to - not the actual function itself.
My concern is that you may be getting into WEBEVENT programming without having done any introductory tutorials, etc so you will continue to make missteps along the way.
It might be quicker in the end to do a basic WEBEVENT tutorial first ..... so that you can understand what the various parts are and how they work?
I'll see if I can find an old tutorial online.
and it looks like this:
Note that it's for the process that the WEBEVENT function belongs to - not the actual function itself.
My concern is that you may be getting into WEBEVENT programming without having done any introductory tutorials, etc so you will continue to make missteps along the way.
It might be quicker in the end to do a basic WEBEVENT tutorial first ..... so that you can understand what the various parts are and how they work?
I'll see if I can find an old tutorial online.
Re: Duplicate Profile getting created
I have found the old VLF WEBEVENT tutorials - but they are not available online.
Do you want LANSA support to email you a copy?
Do you want LANSA support to email you a copy?
Re: Duplicate Profile getting created
Hi Mark,
Please share the documents
Regards,
Priya
Please share the documents
Regards,
Priya
Re: Duplicate Profile getting created
Sent by email. Please let me know if you don't get it.
Re: Duplicate Profile getting created
Hi Mark,
Thanks for sharing the document, we have achieved the expected logic.
Regards,
Priya
Thanks for sharing the document, we have achieved the expected logic.
Regards,
Priya